FAKERS: Reviewers who appear to not have read my book (which did not stop them from writing a review)





Money Week, 4 MAY 2007, ISSUE 331. The article is glowing, but there is a remark: He presents his ideas about unpredictability and luck as breakthrough concepts,  while failing fully to acknowledge his many intellectual debts to the likes of Karl Popper. The anonymous reviewer writing these lines could not have possibly read the book. I am convinced that all the anonymous writer did was cut & paste parts of other reviews then felt like inventing a few facts.